老手艺，有了一份国家产业文件

▍这是一份什么样的文件

先把名字说清楚。"历史经典产业"指的是丝绸、茶叶、瓷器、中药、酿造、工艺美术、文房四宝等一批有历史传承、有文化底蕴的产业。《关于推动历史经典产业高质量发展的意见》由工业和信息化部、人力资源社会保障部、农业农村部、商务部、文化和旅游部、市场监管总局联合印发，经国务院同意，文号为工信部联消费〔2026〕204号，2026 年 8 月 28 日印发、9 月 7 日公开。

这个产业的体量并不小。据工业和信息化部 2026 年 9 月 7 日在国新办发布会上披露，历史经典产业代表性行业的规模以上企业约 2.5 万家，从业人员近 350 万人，年营业收入约 8 万亿元（据不完全统计）。

到 2028 年，培育 50 家百亿规模龙头企业、塑造 100 个中国消费名品、打造若干千亿级规模特色产业集群；到 2030 年，培育一批世界一流企业和知名品牌，推动迈向全球价值链中高端。（《关于推动历史经典产业高质量发展的意见》，工业和信息化部等六部门，工信部联消费〔2026〕204号）

▍和手艺人最相关的三条

文件部署了五方面 20 项任务，通读下来，有三条离做手艺的人最近。

其一，要给产业"画像"。文件提出系统梳理重点保护与传承对象，编制产业名录和分布地图，建设特色优势产区。说白了，国家要先弄清哪些手艺在哪个地方、由谁在做——被看见，是被支持的前提。

其二，给"老手艺"接上"新办法"。文件提出推动高端化、智能化、绿色化转型，同时强调核心技艺的抢救性记录和工序复原。换句话说，技术是请来帮忙的，不是请来换人的——这条边界，文件划得很清楚。

其三，质量与标准被摆上了台面。文件提出以商标品牌、质量与标准引领产业生态。同在 9 月 7 日的发布会上，市场监管总局还提到了《漆器通用技术要求》国家标准，对原辅材料、漆膜漆面等提出明确要求。对漆器行业来说，"好"正在从老师傅的手感，变成可对照的条文。

▍落到出海，这条线已经连上了

文件的第五个方面单列"国际化发展"：搭建多渠道出海平台，加强宣传推广，推动融入国际高端消费市场。这与 2021 年中办、国办《关于进一步加强非物质文化遗产保护工作的意见》里"鼓励非物质文化遗产相关企业拓展国际市场"的表述，前后接得上。

再往前看一步，中办、国办 2026 年 9 月印发的《文化遗产保护传承"十五五"规划》第十七条，也提出"深化非遗赋能历史经典产业升级"。一边是保护传承的规划，一边是产业发展的意见，两份文件指向同一个判断：老手艺不只是要"保下来"的对象，也是要"走上去"的产业。

经济日报的评论说得直白：文化优势不等于产业优势，手艺还要接上品牌、标准与市场的链条。

▍问答

问 ｜ 《关于推动历史经典产业高质量发展的意见》和非遗匠人有什么关系？

答 ｜ 关系很直接。这份文件把工艺美术等老手艺当作"产业"来规划：梳理名录与产区、支持技艺记录与转型、用标准和品牌立规矩、搭平台推动出海。对匠人来说，意味着手艺不只在"保护名录"里有位置，在国家产业版图里也有了位置。

问 ｜ 文件提"智能化转型"，会不会让机器取代手工？

答 ｜ 文件同时提出"核心技艺抢救性记录和工序复原"，转型的方向是让技术帮忙——改良生产管理、提升良品率，而不是替换核心工序。守正与创新的平衡，正是这份文件反复拿捏的地方。

问 ｜ 韵和鸣是什么品牌？做的是什么？

答 ｜ 韵和鸣是未来丝路（山西）国际跨境供应链有限公司旗下的非遗品牌，以平遥推光漆器髹饰技艺为基底，严选全国范围的非遗手工品并带向全球市场。文件里说的"标准""品牌""出海"，正是这个品牌一直在走的路。

▍说在最后

一份产业文件，不会让哪件器物明天就变贵。但它确认了一件事：那些熬时间的手艺，值得被当作正经产业来对待。你身边的老手艺，这些年被"当回事"了吗？欢迎留言说说。

以上仅为个人梳理，具体以官方原文为准。

📩 非遗项目 ｜ 匠人举荐 ｜ 跨境出海 ｜ 线下联营

欢迎留言或后台联系，我们与匠人同行。

—— 韵和鸣 · 与匠人同行

〖 国 〗

相关搜索 ｜ RELATED SEARCHES

历史经典产业 意见 · 工信部 工艺美术 政策 · 漆器通用技术要求 国家标准 · 非遗 产业化 · 韵和鸣 非遗出海

English

Let us be precise about the name. "Historic classic industries" refers to industries with long lineage and cultural depth—silk, tea, porcelain, traditional Chinese medicine, brewing, arts and crafts, and the Four Treasures of the Study. The Opinions were jointly issued by six departments, approved by the State Council, document number MIIT-Lian-Xiaofei [2026] No. 204, printed on August 28, 2026 and made public on September 7.

The scale is far from small. According to figures released by the ministry at a State Council Information Office press conference on September 7, 2026, representative trades within these industries count about 25,000 above-scale enterprises, nearly 3.5 million employees, and roughly 8 trillion yuan in annual revenue (based on incomplete statistics).

By 2028: cultivate 50 leading enterprises with revenues of ten billion yuan, shape 100 famous Chinese consumer brands, and build several hundred-billion-yuan industrial clusters. By 2030: cultivate a group of world-class enterprises and renowned brands, moving toward the middle and high end of the global value chain. (Opinions on Promoting the High-Quality Development of Historic Classic Industries, six departments including MIIT, 2026)

The document lays out twenty tasks in five areas. Reading it through, three stand closest to the people who actually make things.

First, the industry will be mapped. The document calls for a systematic inventory of key objects of protection and transmission, compiling industry catalogs and distribution maps, and building production areas with distinctive strengths. Put plainly, the state first wants to know which crafts live where and who practices them—being seen is the precondition of being supported.

Second, old crafts are to be connected with new methods. The document promotes upgrading toward higher-end, smarter and greener production, while stressing the rescue recording of core techniques and the restoration of original processes. In other words, technology is invited to help, not to replace—the document draws this line clearly.

Third, quality and standards are now on the table. The document calls for leading the industrial ecosystem through trademarks, brands, quality and standards. At the same September 7 press conference, the State Administration for Market Regulation mentioned the national standard "General Technical Requirements for Lacquerware," which sets clear requirements for raw materials and lacquer films. For the lacquer trade, "good" is turning from a master's tactile judgment into clauses one can check against.

The document devotes its fifth area to "international development": building multi-channel platforms for going global, strengthening promotion, and integrating into the international high-end consumer market. This connects with the 2021 Opinions of the General Office of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council on further strengthening the protection of intangible cultural heritage, which encouraged heritage-related enterprises to expand into international markets.

One step further: Article 17 of the "15th Five-Year Plan for the Protection and Transmission of Cultural Heritage," issued in September 2026 by the same two general offices, calls for "deepening the empowerment of historic classic industries through intangible cultural heritage." A plan for preservation on one side, an opinion on industrial development on the other—both point to the same judgment: old crafts are not only objects to be preserved, but an industry expected to climb.

A commentary in the Economic Daily put it bluntly: cultural advantage is not automatically industrial advantage; a craft must still connect to the chains of branding, standards and markets.

What does the Opinions on historic classic industries have to do with heritage craftspeople?

Very directly. The document treats old crafts such as arts and crafts as an industry to be planned: cataloging crafts and production areas, supporting the recording of techniques and their upgrading, setting rules through standards and brands, and building platforms for going global. For craftspeople, their work now has a place not only on the heritage list, but on the national industrial map.

Does "smart upgrading" in the document mean machines replacing handwork?

The same document calls for "rescue recording of core techniques and restoration of original processes." The direction is to let technology help—improving production management and yield—rather than replace core hand processes. Balancing fidelity with innovation is exactly what this document keeps calibrating.

What kind of brand is YUNHEMING, and what does it do?

YUNHEMING is a heritage brand under Future Silk Road (Shanxi) International Cross-border Supply Chain Co., Ltd. Built on the Pingyao polished lacquerware technique, it curates authentic heritage crafts from across China for global markets. Standards, branding and going global—the very words of this document—are the road this brand has been walking.

An industrial policy document will not make any object more valuable tomorrow. But it confirms one thing: crafts that take time deserve to be treated as a serious industry. Have the old crafts around you been taken seriously these years? Tell us in the comments.

The above is only a personal reading; please refer to the official text.

ICH Projects · Artisan Referrals · Global Distribution · Salon Partnerships